Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] vs Otto Virtanen [130th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L W L
Form
W L L W L L L W L LH2H: Zandschulp 2 - 1 Virtanen
They have played 6 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Virtanen winning 2. The last match between Zandschulp and Virtanen was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 16-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 2 |
| Otto Virtanen | 1 |
| Zandschulp | Stats | Virtanen |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (8-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 27% (4-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 89 | Ranking | 130 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 91 |
| 29 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 9 |
| 62% (361-225) | Career Total W/L | 58% (209-150) |
| $3,420,360 | Career Prize Money | $455,200 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Zandschulp VS Virtanen H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 7-6(0) 6-4 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Virtanen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 35 | Games Won | 27 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:11:41 | Average Match Time | 1:11:41 |
| 68% (121/178) | 1st Serve % | 66% (111/167) |
| 81% (98/121) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (85/111) |
| 60% (34/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (29/56) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 32% (53/167) | Return Points Win % | 26% (46/178) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Otto Virtanen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 2 - 1 Virtanen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Virtanen has won 44.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Virtanen has won 46.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.33% and 24.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Virtanen has saved 52.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 51.47% of matches played (W/L 35/ 33), with Virtanen winning 46.67% (W/L 28/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Virtanen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 120/ 51), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 23/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Virtanen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 10/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Zandschulp winning 2 times and Virtanen being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Virtanen winning 2. The last match between Zandschulp and Virtanen was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 16-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Virtanen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Virtanen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Virtanen 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 153.71 while Virtanen has played against players with an average rank of 234.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Virtanen has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 30.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Virtanen has converted 31.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Otto Virtanen
69%
(
95 of
137)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
116)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
50 of
77)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
55 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
131
Total Points Won
122
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Otto Virtanen
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Altmaier
60%
(
56 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
112)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Blockx
Player
Otto Virtanen
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Otto Virtanen
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
10
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Otto Virtanen
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Terence Atmane
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Zandschulp vs Virtanen?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zandschulp Vs Virtanen is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (361/225) | Win/Loss | 58% (209/150) |
| 58% (822/586) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (484/372) |
| 53% (7057/6235) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4284/3980) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.64 |
| 2857 | Aces Total | 2593 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2125 | Total Double Faults | 1189 |
| 1:35:25 | Average Match Time | 1:30:58 |
| 178.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 293.38 |
| 62% (23829/38718) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14775/24912) |
| 71% (17021/23829) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (10755/14775) |
| 48% (7177/14892) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4983/10136) |
| 43% (1767/4096) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (945/2397) |
| 41% (16238/39906) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9588/25161) |
| 62% (334/535) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (203/344) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 30% (3/10) |
| 56% (100/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (80/145) |
| 58% (111/193) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (66/127) |
| 89% (340/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (204/173) |
| 11% (340/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (204/30) |
| 24% (244/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (155/34) |
See recent tennis photos of Zandschulp and Virtanen
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
